Sunday, February 21, 2010

Lexington Revisited and Houses that Change the World




I’m writing this well before dawn on a sleepless morning here in Kentucky. To redeem that time the Spirit prompted me first to pray… for the wonderful couples I had great fellowship with just hours ago, but then to read. It’s interesting how the Lord has impacted me significantly by these reading times during these short but sweet trips back to Kentucky. If you’ve been following this blog for some time you know that significant changes took place in my life after picking up another book the Lord used to powerfully speak to me late last summer. This morning I find myself sliced and diced by the apostolic and prophetic vision advanced by Wolfgang Simson in his high impact book, “Houses that Change the World”


First: those wonderful couples. Months ago I reconnected with one couple outside Lexington at the Spirit’s prompting. It had been nearly 20 years since we visited face to face. I was not surprised to find 2 hearts craving for authenticity, yet isolated and feeling trapped in a web of lifeless religion. On this weekend I was encouraged to see even more signs of life and awakening. They’re not sure how to get where the Lord wants them, but their readiness to walk in that is building, along with their hope… hope that Jesus is still building His church, and they are vital “living stones” He will use to do so. Even as I write this I’m praying that in their home, as they renovate the structure of their house to more comfortably welcome visitors and practice hospitality, that the Lord will prepare their hearts for a home that will change their town and region. I’m believing even now that the life of Christ will overflow from their home and touch many lives for the kingdom: awakening “sleeping saints” to a lively and vibrant fellowship with the Father and ending their isolation and boredom with “religious systems”, and as living stones come together, the world will see the hope that is in Christ and new births will come about as their community finally sees an expression of Jesus, the Living Lord in His people, sharply contrasted from the surrounding landscape of religiosity that repulses them, or in the very least now compels them to ignore “the church”.


The second couple is in a similar yet different place. They’re immersed in “church”, but there’s a growing, nagging sense that something is terribly missing. I’m thankful that my friend, once not too excited to engage me on these things, welcomed me into his home this time around, and blessed me with the joy of hearing his heart come alive with hope. Last night he and his wife shared how they recently said to the Lord that they’re so sick of the status quo, they’re ready for “whatever” He wants to do. Let me encourage you two that He will be faithful to meet you in this. In fact I pray now that this will be a season of deeper fellowship with the Father and a progressive release from “dead works”. And as your freedom in Him increases, the Lord will connect you with like-minded people who are ready to walk in this journey with you. Bring them into their paths Lord… at work… in their neighborhood… even at their church, connect their hearts with others who want to see You glorified and every “foreign” contaminant removed that interrupts that pure connection with You and hinders a joint by joint connection with the Body. We pray, believing You are doing this even now. You are building your church and the gates of hell will not prevail! Amen!

Now: Wolfgang Simson.



I had the privilege of meeting him at the organic church conference in September. And now I’ve finally gotten to dig into his groundbreaking book “Houses that Change the World”.



Better than many others, Wolfgang makes the case for return to house churches. And what has shaken me up is the chapter, “Developing a Persecution-Proof Structure.” Those who know me may be shocked that the implications of walking out life in this paradigm that is “new to us” did not register with me as something that may “invite” persecution. But that reality has set in as I read this morning. Here’s just a small sample of that chapter:

Since every person has been born a sinner (Psalm 51; Romans 3:23), everyone has a wounded consciousness, knowing they are guilty before God. The easy answer to calm this trouble is religion, which is like a built-in feature of every person on earth. The world steams with religion, even if it comes in the form of agnosticism and liberalism, to which teaching its adherents cling with passionate religious fervor. We do not have to do anything to become religious; it is creational, natural, and it creeps in without our being aware, like an ugly spirit raising its head while everyone sleeps. Religion builds up like static energy when we walk with plastic shoes on a carpet. It needs the power of the Holy Spirit, constant prophetic and apostolic ministry, and the ongoing equipping of the saints, to maintain a non-religious, alert and sober spirit, to be free from religion and liberated by Christ to worship Him in truth and spirit. If I were the devil and wanted to stop Christians from being effective witnesses to Jesus, I would certainly let loose on the followers of Jesus the most deadly plague there is on the planet: religion. I would look for the weakest members of the church – who sometimes look to be the strongest! –whisper into their minds the age-old tried and tested words “Did God really say?” (Genesis 3:1), instill in them the hunger for more security, power, glory and fame – and then feed them the ready-made poison of religion. What a triumph for the devil if he can arrange the ultimate demonic scheme: to persecute the church in the name of the church, to persecute the people of God in the name of God and get the functionaries of organized religion to hold the head of the organic body of Christ under the water as long as possible.”
In establishing house-church movements, therefore we need to soberly beware of religious cults emerging around special names, allegedly effective rituals, traditions, moral laws, spiritual practices and methods, pseudo-holy worship patterns and religious experiences that are supposed to be the norm. We need to literally “earth” any religious energy which build up regularly, like static electricity, by coming to the cross of Christ and asking Him to set us free individually and corporately from the religious spirit, and to fill us with His Spirit again and again, until the earth is filled with the fragrance of God, “believers are a letter read by all men” and “the manifold wisdom of God is made known through the church” (Ephesians 3:10), through simple and supernatural house churches in which the people of God share their lives with God and each other. Those houses will literally change the earth.

We also need to understand that, in the days when Stephen spoke against the temple, not only were Saul and his men stirred up to bloodthirsty fanaticism, but literally all hell broke loose. The core of the religious and demonic system to keep people in blindness and ignorance – and therefore lost for eternity – was under attack.


And I can relate to another paragraph that Simson shares about the path “from the old to the new”.


In almost every meeting, seminar or conference on the subject of a relational, organic, house-based church movement the same question inevitably rises: “I understand what you’re saying, and I’m totally with you. But I have this church at home. It runs on the traditional pattern. How do I change the system without destroying the church?! I call this the “How to cross the river without getting my feet wet” question. Can we really have progress without change? I do not think so. But the painful part is all change is personal. It upsets routines and traditions. But if we want to see new things happening in and through the church, we need to be prepared to make personal changes first, changes in the family second, and changes in our ministry third.


Which is a lead-in to something I sense the Lord prompting me to say now: I believe this last paragraph speaks directly to some of you reading this blog. You are fascinated, even excited about what you read here, but you haven’t moved any closer than the water’s edge into the life you know you want with Him and other believers. Let me appeal to you now: ask the Lord for grace to begin taking steps of faith, maybe even small ones, but then take them! After all, this is a walk of faith. There are no spectators in the kingdom of God.

So order your own copy of "Houses that Change the World". You can buy it online by following this link:

http://www.amazon.com/Houses-Change-World-Wolfgang-Simson/dp/185078356X


Order it. Read it. And then, join the revolution!




Sunday, February 14, 2010

Word of Caution, Written in Love

After reading the latest newsletter from Don Atkin, it was a no-brainer as to whether to post it here. I hope the Lord uses it to speak to you, just as He has with me.


Words of Caution, Written in Love





Saturday, February 6, 2010

In the Spotlight: Haiti

There will be much more on this subject in the coming days. In fact, my visit there is the major reason this site has not been updated for a couple of weeks. In the meantime you can read an article on the visit posted in the Charlotte Observer today, Saturday February 6.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/413/story/1227889.html




Thursday, January 21, 2010

Authority, Accountability, and the Apostolic Movement



For years much of my struggle with the institutional church has centered around leadership. I've always sensed something was wrong, but wasn't able to define or explain it biblically. In recent months, I've met wise Ephesians 4 leaders who understand why they're here...and they walk in their calling as "equippers"... not as "lords" of religious kingdoms. And some of those men have written insightful and encouraging articles and books that provide a true Kingdom perspective on leadership. One of those men is Dr. Steve Crosby.




I met Steve at a conference here in Charlotte back in September. And now I've finally gotten around to reading his excellent book, "Authority, Accountability and the Apostolic Movement". Here's just a sample that I hope will prompt you to order the book and read it promptly. There's also a link at the bottom of this page to Amazon, where you can order your own copy.

The excerpt I'm sharing is from the chapter, "I Have It on Higher Authority?". Crosby tackles biblical illiteracy and the "pastor centered" system that characterizes way too many churches:

Unhealthy dependency on pulpit ministry promotes passivity in the hearer. Our job as leaders is to equip others to handle the Word of God accurately for themselves, not keep them dependent on our exegetical and pulpit abilities. Failure here opens the door to unhealthy co-dependencies and control. Insecure leaders and lazy saints, frankly, are content with the arrangement.

The leader's role is to work him or herself out of a job. We begin by interpreting the Word to new converts until we equip them with the tools to do it themselves. Then we need to get out of the way! So each Sunday morning activity is nothing more than the carnal thrill a pulpit minister gets from having a regularly captive audience in awe of his great revelation and oratorical skills. The spoon-fed congregation comes to be impressed by the latest cutting-edge revelation rather than being practically equipped to handle the Word of God themselves.

The highest function of the prophetic ministry is not to broker divine thought and understanding to others. The highest prophetic function is not telling others what you see. It is the ability to give (impart) to others the faculty of divine sight! Our call as leaders is to put the believer and the Lord into a hand-to-hand and face-to-face relationship, not keep them lapping at the trough of our biblical insights. If we are standing by, trying to arrange the fingers in the divine handshake, we are meddlesome controllers, transgressing the second tier of authority. Our authority as leaders does not extend to the eternal brokering of the Word of God to the believer.

First-generation, resurrection-witnessing, dead-raising, miracle-working apostles taught the Bereans, and they were commended for checking things out! If the first-century saints are thus commended, how much more should we, two thousand years later, do likewise? For some reason, professional ministry attracts insecure people like bees to honey. They mistakenly expect personal validation through the acclaim that can accompany pulpit ministry - the perceived admiration of others. However, their personal insecurity is threatened when instead of doe-eyed awe and admiration they are met with honest inquiry, examination, and questions presented in a right spirit.

When emphasis on honoring leadership (and it frequently is over-emphasized) combines with a celebrity spirit that accompanies any form of success in an American paradigm, leaders begin to believe their own press reports about how wonderful they are. A subtle spirit of "immunity" creeps in. Woe to the leader who dismisses every honest inquiry as either beneath his dignity to address, or who attributes it to disloyal, dishonoring, rebellious, deceived saints who just need to submit. Leaders owe it to God's flock to fully equip them to handle the Word accurately for themselves and to honestly answer any question given in a right spirit. Insecure leaders are intimidated by inquiring minds larger than their own. Inquiry is not subversion.





http://www.amazon.com/Authority-Accountability-Apostolic-Movement-Stephen/dp/1414106408





Sunday, January 10, 2010

THE WAR ON FULLNESS

I cannnot remember a higher sense of anticipation for reading any newsletter in recent history than the one I'm sharing with you now. This is another great blessing of the Lord through my developing friendship with Don Atkin. Back in the Fall, I got to hear and meet Mark Setch at the Global Communion conference here in Charlotte. The spostolic and prophetic vision he shared during his session further inflamed my desire to see the glory of the risen Lord Jesus Christ reigning supreme in His Church. And I'm confident THE WAR ON FULLNESS will have the same effect on you.


There is a war on the fullness of Christ in the world.
There are forces that oppose the fullness of Jesus and
forces that inhibit the fullness of Jesus. I contend
that the institutional church construct actually inhibits
the capacity of the Church to be the fullness of
Christ.

Institutional church construct refers to the overarching
mindset and structure that predisposes congregations, denominations,
house churches, ministry networks, and mission
organizations to give priority to building, maintaining and defending
their distinctive expression of “church” over and
against the local, regional, national and global expression of
the Body of Christ.


________________________________________________________
Mark Setch, is a relating apostolic servant leader
based in Australia. He has captured the essence of
one of the greatest single challenges for today’s
church, and has presented it with much love and
grace. This may be the most important message
that you will read this year! —Don Atkin



The War on Fullness




Saturday, January 9, 2010

SINS OF OMISSION

The final item from Don Atkin's newsletter is from Don. It is brief, but it packs quite a punch!

SINS OF OMISSION

Perhaps the greater sins are those of “omission.” Malachi’s (4:6) prophetic promise, the restoring of hearts to hearts—fathers to children
and children to fathers—is a fitting and current example. Children are wounded, provoked to wrath, when fathers fail to bring
them up in the training and admonition of the Lord (Ephesians 4:6).

Believers are likewise wounded and unable to fulfill their destiny when the fathers of the faith—those who are to shepherd and equip
the saints—fail to bring them up in the training and admonition of the Lord. Failure to faithfully obey The Great Commission is one of
the church’s great sins of omission. Failure to discern true disciples of Jesus and train them up in the way they should go (Proverbs 22:6),
robs them of coming into their true identity and mission as sons of God (Romans 8:14-19).

Perhaps the more relevant question is: “What have we NOT done?”






Thursday, January 7, 2010

"IF ONLY..."

I hope you've enjoyed the articles from Don Atkin's newsletter. One reason: you're about to take in yet another one. This one comes from Steve Crosby.

"IF ONLY..."

Perhaps my inbox is like yours. I get quite a few mailings, blog links, and newsletters deploring the state
of the Church and the myriad deficiencies that supposedly must be addressed before we can expect to
see God’s goodness manifest. Here’s a small sample of the type of commentary that abounds on the
Internet:

Many Christians are careful to observe certain times, places, and rituals of worship, but when the church service is over,
they’re like those who profess no regard for Christ. In their manner of life, in the way they spend their time and money, in
their cares and worries, fears and pleasures, indulgences and diversions, it is often impossible to distinguish professing
Christians from the rankest unbelievers, until they once again gather to sing of their love and devotion to Jesus. Little wonder
that the skeptic makes such false standard-bearers the object of his scorn and jest, because he sees that their devotion goes
no deeper than the words they use in song and prayer. How can this be called Christianity, when such a manner of life finds
its proper condemnation in every page of the New Testament?

The church is filled with professing Christians whose faith has never gone beyond a conviction that the words of Scripture
are true. They believe in the Christ of the Bible, but do not know Him personally.

Many reformations have taken place throughout church history, but truth forces us to say that they have been in a large part
so many runaway births from the same mother, Babylon. Reformation requires a full departure from the wisdom of this world.

These statements are likely diagnostically true of the current state of affairs. There’s only one problem. William Law wrote them approximately
three hundred years ago.

There are those who are inclined “revivalistically” who would have us believe that if we were just more____________ (fill in the blank
with a virtue of your choice) that we would finally satisfy God somehow and revival would spring forth. If three hundred years of the
prayers of the righteous have been so ineffective as to show no progress, or even regression, why would we think more of the same
kind of effort for the next three hundred years would produce different results? Will people three hundred years from now be bemoaning
their state by reading about us bemoaning ours?

Could it be that we have some faulty, and in no small way, fancifully romantic ideas of what “revival” looks like? There has never been
a perfect day in a perfect church, because human beings are always involved. Since Calvary, every day is a day of divine favor and
opportunity, not prescribed perfections. His mercies are new every morning. Spiritual idealism will kill present joy.

There’s a great tension regarding the Lord’s Church. It’s both a disaster and a wonder at the same time. We all tend to view the
Church and what “needs to happen” through the lens of our gift mix and calling. We all have an “if only” that reflects the particular
prism through which we view what we believe to be lacking, or otherwise “holding back revival” in the Church:

If only we would win more souls, then God would . . .
If only we had more prayer and fasting, then God would . . .
If only we had more commitment to the Word, then God would . . .
If only our families were in order, then God would . . .
If only we had more character integrity, then God would . . .
If only we had more inner healing, then God would . . .
If only we were more repentant, then God would . . .
If only we would cry out in anguish, then God would . . .
If only we had more intimacy in worship, then God would . . .
If only we had citywide unity, then God would . . .
If only we had the demonstration of power and miracles, then God would . . .
If only we would abandon man-made traditions, then God would . . .
If only we would humble ourselves enough, then God would . . .
If only we could reach the next generation, then God would . . .
If only we could throw off the spirit of poverty, then God would . . .
If only we had more love, then God would . . .

The list never ends. Dear friends, these things could be said of any generation. Depending on how you and I are “wired” and called,
we will differ in our opinions of what we think the vital missing ingredient might be to supposedly release the manifestation of His kingdom
in fullness.

How is it that a faith that supposedly starts out with the unmerited favor of God degenerates into our trying to overcome the eternal
dissatisfactions of God with the shortcomings of our behavior?

Skilled pulpiteers can intellectually and emotionally manipulate a crowd into a weep-fest by carping on individual or corporate deficiencies
ad nauseum. The same pulpiteers can simultaneously build quite a following for themselves, as “champions of __________” (fill
in the blank with the cause of your choice.) God is not necessarily involved in any of it. It doesn’t take a genius to see what’s wrong.
It’s another matter to reveal Christ as all sufficient for all perceived lack—individual and corporate—past, present, and future.

The great danger among revivalists and those (including myself) who are passionate for purity, accuracy, and radical reformation is
that if we are not deeply established in the delights of the present reality of the New Covenant and the grace of God, we risk being
perpetually frustrated and dissatisfied. Rather than being messengers of the Good News of Jesus Christ, we can become the spiritual
equivalent of a supermarket tabloid: bad news sells—52 weeks a year.

God is not limited by our “if onlys.” In fact, in Christ, He took the “if onlys” out of the divine equation. The Old Covenant is characterized
by humanity’s ifs and God’s responses: if you . . . then I will. There are no “ifs” in the New Covenant. In the New Covenant, God
has declared His “I wills” (8 uncontingent “I wills” of God in the NC promise of Jer.31/Heb.8) apart from our “if onlys.” God has sworn
an oath with Himself (Hebrews 6:17-20), because He knows He cannot rely on our “if onlys” and promises. The “if onlys” have all
been met by Jesus Christ, crucified, and resurrected. Our job is to appropriate by faith what is done, and live it out, not create a list of
contingencies for God.

New Covenant Christianity is meant to be enjoyed, savored, and experienced as a present reality, in the face of all deficiencies. Even
as different ones of us pursue much needed change and reform, we must never forget the favor and amen of God that rests upon His
Church, even as she experiences the chastising disciplines of a child, and the unnecessary self-inflicted woes of her carnalities.

Steve Crosby
www.SteveCrosby.org